Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

History of Medicine

About   |  Collections   |  Exhibitions   |  Research Tools   |  Copyright   |  Get Involved   |  Visit   |  Contact

Banner for Rewriting the Book of Nature: Charles Darwin and the Rise of Evolutionary Theory banner with a drawing of Charles Darwin as a young man, circa 1830s.

The Books of Darwin

More Books continued


Diagrammatic depiction of orchid with all its petals removed in order to clearly illustrate areas of fertilization, from Darwin's On the fertilization of orchids.
Large butterfly orchid, in Charles Darwin, On the fertilization of orchids, 1862

Fertilization of Orchids (1862)

When thinking of Darwin, the place of humans among other species comes first to mind. In fact, after writing On the Origin of Species, most of Darwin’s research and writing was on plants. Six of the ten books Darwin wrote after the Origin were on plants, and two of the remaining four books touched on them. The first book was On the various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are Fertilized by insects, and on the good effects of intercrossing, published by John Murray in 1862. The book contained the detailed observations that he thought necessary to support his theory of natural selection, focusing on the complex interplay between plants and insects—a work of ecology. Moreover, this book was calculatedly clever. Orchids were among the most varied, profligate, and showy of plants. Darwin concluded that

“In my examination of Orchids, hardly any fact has so much struck me as the endless diversity of structure,—the prodigality of resources,—for gaining the very same end, namely, the fertilization of one flower by the pollen of another, . . . the fact [of which] is intelligible on the principle of natural selection.” [pp. 348–349].

If the variety and beauty of orchids—the least competitive, most benign, and most fancifully useless of creatures—was the result of natural selection, what could stand in the way of accepting natural selection where nature was “red in tooth and claw”?

Last Reviewed: May 7, 2014